最受推薦的Workday-Pro-Integrations指南，Workday Workday Integrations認證Workday-Pro-Integrations考試題庫提供免費下載

我們都是平平凡凡的普通人，有時候所學的所掌握的東西沒有那麼容易徹底的吸收，所以經常忘記，當我們需要時就拼命的補習，當你看到Testpdf Workday的Workday-Pro-Integrations考試培訓資料是，你才明白這是你必須要購買的，它可以讓你毫不費力的通過考試，也可以讓你不那麼努力的補習，相信Testpdf，相信它讓你看到你的未來美好的樣子，再苦再難，只要Testpdf還在，總會找到希望的光明。

在這個人才濟濟的社會裏，你不覺得壓力很大嗎，不管你的學歷有多高，它永遠不代表實力。學歷只是一個敲門磚，而實力確是你穩固自己地位的基石。Workday的Workday-Pro-Integrations考試認證就是一個流行的IT認證，很多人都想擁有它，有了它就可以穩固自己的職業生涯，Testpdf Workday的Workday-Pro-Integrations考試認證培訓資料是個很好的培訓工具，它可以幫助你成功的通過考試而獲得認證，有了這個認證，你將得到國際的認可及接受，那時的你再也不用擔心被老闆炒魷魚了。

>> Workday-Pro-Integrations指南 <<

頂尖的Workday-Pro-Integrations指南＆認證考試的領導者材料和最新更新Workday-Pro-Integrations考題

我們的Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations 認證考試的最新培訓資料是Testpdf的專業團隊不斷地研究出來的，可以幫很多人成就夢想。在現在的競爭激烈的IT行業中，想要穩固自己的地位，就得向專業人士證明自己的知識和技術水準。Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations 認證考試是一個很好的證明自己能力的考試。有了Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations認證證書，你工作會有很大的變化，工資和工作職位都會有所提升。

最新的 Workday Integrations Workday-Pro-Integrations 免費考試真題 (Q21-Q26):

問題 #21
This is the XML file generated from a Core Connector; Positions integration.

When performing an XSLT Transformation on the Core Connector: Positions XML output file, you want to show a hyperlink of positions that are not available for hiring as an entry in the Message tab.
What are all the needed ETV items to meet the above requirements?

答案：C

解題說明：
In Workday integrations, the Extension for Transformation and Validation (ETV) framework is used within XSLT transformations to apply validation and formatting rules to XML data, such as the output from a Core Connector (e.g., Positions integration). In this scenario, you need to perform an XSLT transformation on the Core Connector: Positions XML output file to display a hyperlink for positions that are not available for hiring as an entry in the Message tab. This requires configuring ETV attributes to ensure the data is present and correctly targeted for the hyperlink.
Here's why option B is correct:
* Requirement Analysis: The requirement specifies showing a hyperlink for positions "not available for hiring." In the provided XML, the ps:Available_For_Hire field under ps:Position_Data indicates whether a position is available for hire (e.g., <ps:Available_For_Hire>true</ps:Available_For_Hire>).
For positions where this is false, you need to create a message (hyperlink) in the Message tab, which typically requires linking to a Workday ID (WID) or other identifier.
* ETV Attributes:
* etv:required="true": This ensures that the ps:WID value under ps:Additional_Information is mandatory for the transformation. If the WID is missing, the transformation will fail or generate an error, ensuring that the hyperlink can be created only for valid positions with an associated WID.
* etv:target="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]": This specifies that the target of the transformation (e.g., the hyperlink) should be the WID value found at ps:Additional_Information
/ps:WID in the XML. This WID can be used to construct a hyperlink to the position in Workday, meeting the requirement to show a hyperlink for positions not available for hiring.
* Context in XML: The XML shows ps:Additional_Information containing ps:WID (e.g., <ps:
WID>73bd4d8562e04b1820f55818467905b</ps:WID>), which is a unique identifier for the position.
By targeting this WID with etv:target, you ensure the hyperlink points to the correct position record in Workday when ps:Available_For_Hire is false.
Why not the other options?
* A.
* etv:minLength="0"
* etv:targetWID="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]"
* etv:minLength="0" allows the WID to be empty or have zero length, which contradicts the need for a valid WID to create a hyperlink. It does not ensure the data is present, making it unsuitable.
Additionally, etv:targetWID is not a standard ETV attribute; the correct attribute is etv:target, making this option incorrect.
* C.
* etv:minLength="0"
* etv:target="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]"
* Similar to option A, etv:minLength="0" allows the WID to be empty, which does not meet the requirement for a mandatory WID to create a hyperlink. This makes it incorrect, as the hyperlink would fail if the WID is missing.
* D.
* etv:required="true"
* etv:targetWID="[ps:Additional_Information/ps:WID]"
* While etv:required="true" ensures the WID is present, etv:targetWID is not a standard ETV attribute. The correct attribute is etv:target, making this option syntactically incorrect and unsuitable for the transformation.
To implement this in XSLT for a Workday integration:
* Use the ETV attributes from option B (etv:required="true" and etv:target="[ps:Additional_Information
/ps:WID]") within your XSLT template to validate and target the ps:WID for positions where ps:
Available_For_Hire is false. This ensures the transformation generates a valid hyperlink in the Message tab, linking to the position's WID in Workday.
References:
* Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide: Section on "ETV in XSLT Transformations" - Details the use of ETV attributes like required and target for validating and targeting data in Workday XML, including handling identifiers like WID for hyperlinks.
* Workday Core Connector and EIB Guide: Chapter on "XML Transformations" - Explains how to use ETV attributes in XSLT to process position data, including creating messages or hyperlinks based on conditions like Available_For_Hire.
* Workday Integration System Fundamentals: Section on "ETV for Message Generation" - Covers applying ETV attributes to generate hyperlinks in the Message tab, ensuring data integrity and correct targeting of Workday identifiers like WID.

問題 #22
You need to filter a custom report to only show workers that have been terminated after a user-prompted date.
How do you combine conditions in the filter to meet this requirement?

A. Worker Status is equal to the value retrieved from a prompt AND Termination Date is less than a value retrieved from a prompt.
B. Worker Status is equal to the value "Terminated" OR Termination Date is greater than a value retrieved from a prompt
C. Worker Status is equal to the value "Terminated" AND Termination Date is greater than a value retrieved from a prompt.
D. Worker Status is equal to the value retrieved from a prompt OR Termination Date is equal to a value retrieved from a prompt.

答案：C

解題說明：
The requirement is to filter a custom report to show only workers terminated after a user-prompted date. In Workday, filters are defined in the Filter tab of the custom report definition, and conditions can be combined using AND/OR logic to refine the dataset. Let's analyze the requirement and options:
* Key Conditions:
* Workers must beterminated, so the "Worker Status" field must equal "Terminated."
* The termination must occuraftera user-specified date, so the "Termination Date" must be greater than the prompted value.
* Both conditions must be true for a worker to appear in the report, requiring anANDcombination.
* Option Analysis:
* A. Worker Status is equal to the value "Terminated" OR Termination Date is greater than a value retrieved from a prompt: Incorrect. Using OR means the report would include workers who are terminated (regardless of date) OR workers with a termination date after the prompt (even if not terminated), which doesn't meet the strict requirement of terminated workers after a specific date.
* B. Worker Status is equal to the value retrieved from a prompt AND Termination Date is less than a value retrieved from a prompt: Incorrect. Worker Status shouldn't be a prompted value (it's fixed as "Terminated"), and "less than" would show terminations before the date, not after.
* C. Worker Status is equal to the value retrieved from a prompt OR Termination Date is equal to a value retrieved from a prompt: Incorrect. Worker Status shouldn't be prompted, and
"equal to" limits the filter to exact matches, not "after" the date. OR logic also broadens the scope incorrectly.
* D. Worker Status is equal to the value "Terminated" AND Termination Date is greater than a value retrieved from a prompt: Correct. This ensures workers are terminated (fixed value) AND their termination date is after the user-entered date, precisely meeting the requirement.
* Implementation:
* In the custom report's Filter tab, add two conditions:
* Field: Worker Status, Operator: equals, Value: "Terminated".
* Field: Termination Date, Operator: greater than, Value: Prompt for Date (configured as a report prompt).
* Set the logical operator between conditions toAND.
* Test with a sample date to verify only terminated workers after that date appear.
References from Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide:
* Workday Report Writer Fundamentals: Section on "Creating and Managing Filters" details combining conditions with AND/OR logic and using prompts.
* Integration System Fundamentals: Notes how filtered reports support integration data sources with dynamic user inputs.

問題 #23
What is the limitation when assigning ISUs to integration systems?

A. An ISU can be assigned to five integration systems.
B. An ISU can be assigned to only one integration system.
C. An ISU can be assigned to an unlimited number of integration systems.
D. An ISU can only be assigned to an ISSG and not an integration system.

答案：B

解題說明：
This question examines the limitations on assigning Integration System Users (ISUs) to integration systems in Workday Pro Integrations. Let's analyze the relationship and evaluate each option to determine the correct answer.
Understanding ISUs and Integration Systems in Workday
* Integration System User (ISU):An ISU is a specialized user account in Workday designed for integrations, functioning as a service account to authenticate and execute integration processes. ISUs are created using the "Create Integration System User" task and are typically configured with settings like disabling UI sessions and setting long session timeouts (e.g., 0 minutes) toprevent expiration during automated processes. ISUs are not human users but are instead programmatic accounts used for API calls, EIBs, Core Connectors, or other integration mechanisms.
* Integration Systems:In Workday, an "integration system" refers to the configuration or setup of an integration, such as an External Integration Business (EIB), Core Connector, or custom integration via web services. Integration systems are defined to handle data exchange between Workday and external systems, and they require authentication, often via an ISU, to execute tasks like data retrieval, transformation, or posting.
* Assigning ISUs to Integration Systems:ISUs are used to authenticate and authorize integration systems to interact with Workday. When configuring an integration system, you assign an ISU to provide the credentials needed for the integration to run. This assignment ensures that the integration can access Workday data and functionalities based on the security permissions granted to the ISU via its associated Integration System Security Group (ISSG).
* Limitation on Assignment:Workday's security model imposes restrictions to maintain control and auditability. Specifically, an ISU is designed to be tied to a single integration system to ensure clear accountability, prevent conflicts, and simplify security management. This limitation prevents an ISU from being reused across multiple unrelated integration systems, reducing the risk of unintended access or data leakage.
Evaluating Each Option
Let's assess each option based on Workday's integration and security practices:
Option A: An ISU can be assigned to five integration systems.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. Workday does not impose a specific numerical limit like "five" for ISU assignments to integration systems. Instead, the limitation is more restrictive: an ISU is typically assigned to only one integration system to ensure focused security and accountability. Allowing an ISU to serve multiple systems could lead to confusion, overlapping permissions, or security risks, which Workday's design avoids.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:There's no documentation or standard practice in Workday Pro Integrations suggesting a limit of five integration systems per ISU. This option is arbitrary and inconsistent with Workday's security model.
Option B: An ISU can be assigned to an unlimited number of integration systems.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. Workday's security best practices do not allow an ISU to be assigned to an unlimited number of integration systems. Allowing this would create security vulnerabilities, as an ISU' s permissions (via its ISSG) could be applied across multiple unrelated systems, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data conflicts. Workday enforces a one-to-one or tightly controlled relationship to maintain auditability and security.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:The principle of least privilege and clear accountability in Workday integrations requires limiting an ISU's scope, not allowing unlimited assignments.
Option C: An ISU can be assigned to only one integration system.
* Analysis:This is correct. In Workday, an ISU is typically assigned to a single integration system to ensure that its credentials and permissions are tightly scoped. This aligns with Workday's security model, where ISUs are created for specific integration purposes (e.g., an EIB, Core Connector, or web service integration). When configuring an integration system, you specify the ISU in the integration setup (e.g., under "Integration System Attributes" or "Authentication" settings), and it is not reused across multiple systems to prevent conflicts or unintended access. This limitation ensures traceability and security, as the ISU's actions can be audited within the context of that single integration.
* Why It Fits:Workday documentation and best practices, including training materials and community forums, emphasize that ISUs are dedicated to specific integrations. For example, when creating an EIB or Core Connector, you assign an ISU, and it is not shared across other integrations unless explicitly reconfigured, which is rare and discouraged for security reasons.
Option D: An ISU can only be assigned to an ISSG and not an integration system.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. While ISUs are indeed assigned to ISSGs to inherit security permissions (as established in Question 26), they are also assigned to integration systems toprovide authentication and authorization for executing integration tasks. The ISU's role includes both: it belongs to an ISSG for permissions and is linked to an integration system for execution. Saying it can only be assigned to an ISSG and not an integration system misrepresents Workday's design, as ISUs are explicitly configured in integration systems (e.g., EIB, Core Connector) to run processes.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:ISUs are integral to integration systems, providing credentials for API calls or data exchange. Excluding assignment to integration systems contradicts Workday's integration framework.
Final Verification
The correct answer is Option C, as Workday limits an ISU to a single integration system to ensure security, accountability, and clarity in integration operations. This aligns with the principle of least privilege, where ISUs are scoped narrowly to avoid overexposure. For example, when setting up a Core Connector: Job Postings (as in Question 25), you assign an ISU specifically for that integration, not multiple ones, unless reconfiguring for a different purpose, which is atypical.
Supporting Documentation
The reasoning is based on Workday Pro Integrations security practices, including:
* Workday Community documentation on creating and managing ISUs and integration systems.
* Tutorials on configuring EIBs, Core Connectors, and web services, which show assigning ISUs to specific integrations (e.g.,Workday Advanced Studio Tutorial).
* Integration security overviews from implementation partners (e.g., NetIQ, Microsoft Learn, Reco.ai) emphasizing one ISU per integration for security.
* Community discussions on Reddit and Workday forums reinforcing that ISUs are tied to single integrations for auditability (r/workday on Reddit).

問題 #24
What is the purpose of granting an ISU modify access to the Integration Event domain via an ISSG?

A. To let the ISU configure integration attributes and maps.
B. To log into the user interface as the ISU and launch the integration.
C. To have the ISU own the integration schedule.
D. To build the integration system as the ISU.

答案：A

解題說明：
Understanding ISUs and Integration Systems in Workday
* Integration System User (ISU):An ISU is a specialized user account in Workday designed for integrations, functioning as a service account to authenticate and execute integration processes. ISUs are created using the "Create Integration System User" task and are typically configured with settings like disabling UI sessions and setting long session timeouts (e.g., 0 minutes) to prevent expiration during automated processes. ISUs are not human users but are instead programmatic accounts used for API calls, EIBs, Core Connectors, or other integration mechanisms.
* Integration Systems:In Workday, an "integration system" refers to the configuration or setup of an integration, such as an External Integration Business (EIB), Core Connector, or custom integration via web services. Integration systems are defined to handle data exchange between Workday and external systems, and they require authentication, often via an ISU, to execute tasks like data retrieval, transformation, or posting.
* Assigning ISUs to Integration Systems:ISUs are used to authenticate and authorize integration systems to interact with Workday. When configuring an integration system, you assign an ISU to provide the credentials needed for the integration to run. This assignment ensures that theintegration can access Workday data and functionalities based on the security permissions granted to the ISU via its associated Integration System Security Group (ISSG).
* Limitation on Assignment:Workday's security model imposes restrictions to maintain control and auditability. Specifically, an ISU is designed to be tied to a single integration system to ensure clear accountability, prevent conflicts, and simplify security management. This limitation prevents an ISU from being reused across multiple unrelated integration systems, reducing the risk of unintended access or data leakage.
Evaluating Each Option
Let's assess each option based on Workday's integration and security practices:
Option A: An ISU can be assigned to five integration systems.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. Workday does not impose a specific numerical limit like "five" for ISU assignments to integration systems. Instead, the limitation is more restrictive: an ISU is typically assigned to only one integration system to ensure focused security and accountability. Allowing an ISU to serve multiple systems could lead to confusion, overlapping permissions, or security risks, which Workday's design avoids.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:There's no documentation or standard practice in Workday Pro Integrations suggesting a limit of five integration systems per ISU. This option is arbitrary and inconsistent with Workday's security model.
Option B: An ISU can be assigned to an unlimited number of integration systems.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. Workday's security best practices do not allow an ISU to be assigned to an unlimited number of integration systems. Allowing this would create security vulnerabilities, as an ISU' s permissions (via its ISSG) could be applied across multiple unrelated systems, potentially leading to unauthorized access or data conflicts. Workday enforces a one-to-one or tightly controlled relationship to maintain auditability and security.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:The principle of least privilege and clear accountability in Workday integrations requires limiting an ISU's scope, not allowing unlimited assignments.
Option C: An ISU can be assigned to only one integration system.
* Analysis:This is correct. In Workday, an ISU is typically assigned to a single integration system to ensure that its credentials and permissions are tightly scoped. This aligns with Workday's security model, where ISUs are created for specific integration purposes (e.g., an EIB, Core Connector, or web service integration). When configuring an integration system, you specify the ISU in the integration setup (e.g., under "Integration System Attributes" or "Authentication" settings), and it is not reused across multiple systems to prevent conflicts or unintended access. This limitation ensures traceability and security, as the ISU's actions can be audited within the context of that single integration.
* Why It Fits:Workday documentation and best practices, including training materials and community forums, emphasize that ISUs are dedicated to specific integrations. For example, when creating an EIB or Core Connector, you assign an ISU, and it is not shared across other integrations unless explicitly reconfigured, which is rare and discouraged for security reasons.
Option D: An ISU can only be assigned to an ISSG and not an integration system.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. While ISUs are indeed assigned to ISSGs to inherit security permissions (as established in Question 26), they are also assigned to integration systems to provide authentication and authorization for executing integration tasks. The ISU's role includes both: it belongs to an ISSG for permissions and is linked to an integration system for execution. Saying it can only be assigned to an ISSG and not an integration system misrepresents Workday's design, as ISUs are explicitly configured in integration systems (e.g., EIB, Core Connector) to run processes.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:ISUs are integral to integration systems, providing credentials for API calls or data exchange. Excluding assignment to integration systems contradicts Workday's integration framework.
Final Verification
The correct answer is Option C, as Workday limits an ISU to a single integration system to ensure security, accountability, and clarity in integration operations. This aligns with the principle of least privilege, where ISUs are scoped narrowly to avoid overexposure. For example, when setting up a Core Connector: Job Postings (as in Question 25), you assign an ISU specifically for that integration, not multiple ones, unless reconfiguring for a different purpose, which is atypical.
Supporting Documentation
The reasoning is based on Workday Pro Integrations security practices, including:
* Workday Community documentation on creating and managing ISUs and integration systems.
* Tutorials on configuring EIBs, Core Connectors, and web services, which show assigning ISUs to specific integrations (e.g.,Workday Advanced Studio Tutorial).
* Integration security overviews from implementation partners (e.g., NetIQ, Microsoft Learn, Reco.ai) emphasizing one ISU per integration for security.
* Community discussions on Reddit and Workday forums reinforcing that ISUs are tied to single integrations for auditability (r/workday on Reddit).
This question focuses on the purpose of granting an Integration System User (ISU) modify access to the Integration Event domain via an Integration System Security Group (ISSG) in Workday Pro Integrations. Let' s analyze the role of the ISU, the Integration Event domain, and evaluate each option to determine the correct answer.
Understanding ISUs, ISSGs, and the Integration Event Domain
* Integration System User (ISU):As described in previous questions, an ISU is a service account for integrations, used to authenticate and execute integration processes in Workday. ISUs are assigned to ISSGs to inherit security permissions and are linked to specific integration systems (e.g., EIBs, Core Connectors) for execution.
* Integration System Security Group (ISSG):An ISSG is a security group that defines the permissions for ISUs, controlling what data and functionalities they can access or modify. ISSGs can be unconstrained (access all instances) or constrained (access specific instances based on context).
Permissions are granted via domain security policies, such as "Get," "Put," "View," or "Modify," applied to Workday domains.
* Integration Event Domain:In Workday, the Integration Event domain (or Integration Events security domain) governs access to integration-related activities, such as managing integration events, schedules, attributes, mappings, and logs. This domain is critical for integrations, as it controls the ability to create, modify, or view integration configurations and runtime events.
* "Modify" access to the Integration Event domain allows the ISU to make changes to integration configurations, such as attributes (e.g., file names, endpoints), mappings (e.g., data transformations), and event settings (e.g., schedules or triggers).
* This domain does not typically grant UI access or ownership of schedules but focuses on configuration and runtime control.
* Purpose of Granting Modify Access:Granting an ISU modify access to the Integration Event domain via an ISSG enables the ISU to perform configuration tasks for integrations, ensuring the integration system can adapt or update its settings programmatically. This is essential for automated integrations that need to adjust mappings, attributes, or event triggers without manual intervention. However, ISUs are not designed for UI interaction or administrative ownership, as they are service accounts.
Evaluating Each Option
Let's assess each option based on Workday's security and integration model:
Option A: To have the ISU own the integration schedule.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. ISUs do not "own" integration schedules or any other integration components. Ownership is not a concept applicable to ISUs, which are service accounts for execution, not administrative entities. Integration schedules are configured within the integration system (e.g., EIB or Core Connector) and managed by administrators or users with appropriate security roles, not by ISUs. Modify access to the Integration Event domain allows changes to schedules, but it doesn't imply ownership.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:ISUs lack administrative control or ownership; they execute based on permissions, not manage schedules as owners. This misinterprets the ISU's role.
Option B: To let the ISU configure integration attributes and maps.
* Analysis:This is correct. Granting modify access to the Integration Event domain allows the ISU to alter integration configurations, including attributes (e.g., file names, endpoints, timeouts) and mappings (e.g., data transformations like worker subtype mappings from Question 25). The Integration Event domain governs these configuration elements, and "Modify" permission enables the ISU to update them programmatically during integration execution. This is a standard use case for ISUs in automated integrations, ensuring flexibility without manual intervention.
* Why It Fits:Workday's documentation and training materials indicate that the Integration Event domain controls integration configuration tasks. For example, in an EIB or Core Connector, an ISU with modify access can adjust mappings or attributes, as seen in tutorials on integration setup (Workday Advanced Studio Tutorial). This aligns with the ISU's role as a service account for dynamic configuration.
Option C: To log into the user interface as the ISU and launch the integration.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. ISUs are not intended for UI interaction. When creating an ISU, a best practice is to disable UI sessions (e.g., set "Allow UI Sessions" to "No") and configure a session timeout of 0 minutes to prevent expiration during automation. ISUs operate programmaticallyvia APIs or integration systems, not through the Workday UI. Modify access to the Integration Event domain enables configuration changes, not UI login or manual launching.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:Logging into the UI contradicts ISU design, as they are service accounts, not user accounts. This option misrepresents their purpose.
Option D: To build the integration system as the ISU.
* Analysis:This is incorrect. ISUs do not "build" integration systems; they execute or configure existing integrations based on permissions. Building an integration system (e.g., creating EIBs, Core Connectors, or web services) is an administrative task performed by users with appropriate security roles (e.g., Integration Build domain access), not ISUs. Modify access to the Integration Event domain allows configuration changes, not the creation or design of integration systems.
* Why It Doesn't Fit:ISUs lack the authority or capability to build integrations; they are for runtime execution and configuration, not development or design.
Final Verification
The correct answer is Option B, as granting an ISU modify access to the Integration Event domain via an ISSG enables it to configure integration attributes (e.g., file names, endpoints) and maps (e.g., data transformations), which are critical for dynamic integration operations. This aligns with Workday's security model, where ISUs handle automated tasks within defined permissions, not UI interaction, ownership, or system building.
For example, in the Core Connector: Job Postings from Question 25, an ISU with modify access to Integration Event could update the filename pattern or worker subtype mappings, ensuring the integration adapts to vendor requirements without manual intervention. This is consistent with Workday's design for integration automation.
Supporting Documentation
The reasoning is based on Workday Pro Integrations security practices, including:
* Workday Community documentation on ISUs, ISSGs, and domain security (e.g., Integration Event domain permissions).
* Tutorials on configuring EIBs and Core Connectors, showing ISUs modifying attributes and mappings (Workday Advanced Studio Tutorial).
* Integration security overviews from implementation partners (e.g., NetIQ, Microsoft Learn, Reco.ai) detailing domain access for ISUs.
* Community discussions on Reddit and Workday forums reinforcing ISU roles for configuration, not UI or ownership (r/workday on Reddit).

問題 #25
Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below. Your integration has the following runs in the integration events report (Date format of MM/DD/YYYY):
Run #1
* Core Connector: Worker Integration System was launched on May 15, 2024 at 3:00:00 AM.
* As of Entry Moment: 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/15/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/01/2024
Run #2
* Core Connector: Worker Integration System was launched on May 31, 2024 at 3:00:00 AM.
* As of Entry Moment: 05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Effective Date: 05/31/2024
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment: 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM
* Last Successful Effective Date: 05/15/2024 On May 13, 2024 Brian Hill receives a salary increase. The new salary amount is set to $90,000.00 with an effective date of April 30,2024. Which of these runs will include Brian Hill's compensation change?

A. Brian Hill will be excluded from both integration runs.
B. Brian Hill will only be included in the second integration run.
C. Brian Hill will be included in both integration runs.
D. Brian Hill will only be included in the first integration run.

答案：A

解題說明：
The scenario involves a Core Connector: Worker integration with two runs detailed in the integration events report. The goal is to determine whether Brian Hill's compensation change, effective April 30, 2024, and entered on May 13, 2024, will be included in either of the runs based on their date launch parameters. Let's analyze each run against the change details to identify the correct answer.
In Workday, the Core Connector: Worker integration in incremental mode (as indicated by the presence of
"Last Successful" parameters) processes changes based on the Transaction Log, filtering them by theEntry Moment(when the change was entered) andEffective Date(when the change takes effect). The integration captures changes where:
* TheEntry Momentfalls between theLast Successful As of Entry Momentand theAs of Entry Moment, and
* TheEffective Datefalls between theLast Successful Effective Dateand theEffective Date.
Brian Hill's compensation change has:
* Entry Moment:05/13/2024 (time not specified, so we assume it occurs at some point during the day, before or up to 11:59:59 PM).
* Effective Date:04/30/2024.
Analysis of Run #1
* Launch Date:05/15/2024 at 3:00:00 AM
* As of Entry Moment:05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM - The latest point for when changes were entered.
* Effective Date:05/15/2024 - The latest effective date for changes.
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment:05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM - The starting point for entry moments.
* Last Successful Effective Date:05/01/2024 - The starting point for effective dates.
For Run #1 to include Brian's change:
* TheEntry Moment(05/13/2024) must be between 05/01/2024 3:00:00 AM and 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM. Since 05/13/2024 falls within this range (assuming the change was entered before 3:00:00 AM on
05/15/2024, which is reasonable unless specified otherwise), this condition is met.
* TheEffective Date(04/30/2024) must be between 05/01/2024 (Last Successful Effective Date) and 05
/15/2024 (Effective Date). However, 04/30/2024 isbefore05/01/2024, so this condition isnot met.
Since the effective date of Brian's change (04/30/2024) precedes theLast Successful Effective Date(05/01
/2024), Run #1 will not include this change. In incremental mode, Workday excludes changes with effective dates prior to the last successful effective date, as those are assumed to have been processed in a prior run (before Run #1's baseline of 05/01/2024).
Analysis of Run #2
* Launch Date:05/31/2024 at 3:00:00 AM
* As of Entry Moment:05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM - The latest point for when changes were entered.
* Effective Date:05/31/2024 - The latest effective date for changes.
* Last Successful As of Entry Moment:05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM - The starting point for entry moments.
* Last Successful Effective Date:05/15/2024 - The starting point for effective dates.
For Run #2 to include Brian's change:
* TheEntry Moment(05/13/2024) must be between 05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM and 05/31/2024 3:00:00 AM. However, 05/13/2024 isbefore05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM, so this condition isnot met.
* TheEffective Date(04/30/2024) must be between 05/15/2024 (Last Successful Effective Date) and 05
/31/2024 (Effective Date). Since 04/30/2024 isbefore05/15/2024, this condition is alsonot met.
In Run #2, theEntry Moment(05/13/2024) precedes theLast Successful As of Entry Moment(05/15/2024 3:
00:00 AM), meaning the change was entered before the starting point of this run's detection window.
Additionally, theEffective Date(04/30/2024) is well before theLast Successful Effective Date(05/15/2024).
Both filters exclude Brian's change from Run #2.
Conclusion
* Run #1:Excluded because the effective date (04/30/2024) is before the Last Successful Effective Date (05/01/2024).
* Run #2:Excluded because the entry moment (05/13/2024) is before the Last Successful As of Entry Moment (05/15/2024 3:00:00 AM) and the effective date (04/30/2024) is before the Last Successful Effective Date (05/15/2024).
Brian Hill's change would have been processed in an earlier run (prior to May 1, 2024) if the integration was running incrementally before Run #1, as its effective date (04/30/2024) predates both runs' baselines. Given the parameters provided, neither Run #1 nor Run #2 captures this change, makingD. Brian Hill will be excluded from both integration runsthe correct answer.
Workday Pro Integrations Study Guide References
* Workday Integrations Study Guide: Core Connector: Worker- Section on "Incremental Processing" explains how changes are filtered based on entry moments and effective dates relative to the last successful run.
* Workday Integrations Study Guide: Launch Parameters- Details how "Last Successful As of Entry Moment" and "Last Successful Effective Date" define the starting point for detecting new changes, excluding prior transactions.
* Workday Integrations Study Guide: Change Detection- Notes that changes with effective dates before the last successful effective date are assumed processed in earlier runs and are skipped in incremental mode.

問題 #26
......

Testpdf 的 Workday-Pro-Integrations 擬真試題覆蓋了真實的 Workday 考試指南，並根據其編定適合全球考生都能通用的題庫，讓每一位考生都能順利通過考試。IT人員想要在業內有所成就，選對IT認證是關鍵，雖然獲取認證需要投入額外的時間與金錢，但事實證明IT認證的投入產出是值得的，對於未來的職業發展非常有利。據業內人士介紹，Workday-Pro-Integrations 公司推出的 Workday 考題發生了變化，請各位 Workday 的 Workday-Pro-Integrations 考生注意一下，不過也不必太著急。

Workday-Pro-Integrations考題: https://www.testpdf.net/Workday-Pro-Integrations.html

因為我們可以提供領先的培訓技術幫助考生輕松通過 Workday-Pro-Integrations考題 - Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam 認證考試，Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations指南你可以免費下載考古題的一部分，Testpdf Workday-Pro-Integrations考題學習資料網實行”產品無效，全額退款”的原則，Testpdf Workday-Pro-Integrations考古題覆蓋了最新的考試指南，根據最新的考試主題進行編訂，確保考生順利通過考試，這幾年IT行業發展非常之迅速，那麼學IT的人也如洪水猛獸般迅速多了起來，他們為了使自己以後有所作為而不斷的努力，Workday的Workday-Pro-Integrations考試認證是IT行業必不可少的認證，許多人為想通過此認證而感到苦惱，Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations指南此版本的先決條件是要求考生所持的電腦必須先安裝Acrobat Reader 讀取程式。

比漠視人命的人讓她看得更為順眼，安全感更高. 那就走陽光大道吧，問題就在Workday-Pro-Integrations於這些東西很罕見啊，現在去哪兒找啊，因為我們可以提供領先的培訓技術幫助考生輕松通過 Workday Pro Integrations Certification Exam 認證考試，你可以免費下載考古題的一部分。

已驗證的Workday Workday-Pro-Integrations指南和最佳的Testpdf - 認證考試材料的領導者

Testpdf學習資料網實行”產品無效，全額退款”的原則，Testpdf Workday-Pro-Integrations考古題覆蓋了最新的考試指南，根據最新的考試主題進行編訂，確保考生順利通過考試，這幾年IT行業發展非常之迅速，那麼學IT的人也如洪水猛獸般迅速多了起來，他們為了使自己以後有所作為而不斷的努力，Workday的Workday-Pro-Integrations考試認證是IT行業必不可少的認證，許多人為想通過此認證而感到苦惱。